aes18 International Evaluation Conference

Robyn Bailey (Allen + Clarke), Emma Walke (University of Sydney), Roxanne Bainbridge (Central Queensland University)

Do new terms such as 'co-design' signal substantively new or different approaches to evaluation? Or are they repackaging old concepts, concepts fundamentally important for ensuring the self-determination of Indigenous peoples? Do 'co' approaches - co-design, co-operative inquiry, co-production, co-creation, inherently address issues such as power and control over decision-making and resources, or can they further entrench current inequities?

We contend that it is not evaluation approaches in and of themselves that can contribute to better outcomes for Indigenous peoples. Rather, the application of principles and practices which consciously address issues of inequity in power, diversity of voices, values and knowledge, and benefits arising from such evaluation projects. 

We have started to build a principles-based framework for guiding our practice, both during the co-design and evaluation of a substantive program aimed at improving outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. This framework attempts to weave together principles emphasised by Aboriginal and Western forms of inquiry - differing ways of knowing, doing and being.  

We invite you to a yarning circle to talk about foundational principles and practices which respect 'all learn, all teach' processes and practices. We would like to explore whether there are evaluation approaches that are inherently more culturally safe and transformative, whether it is the way in which we apply our craft that is key to realising better outcomes for Indigenous and ultimately all peoples, or whether it is something else. The knowledge generated in the session will be shared back with participants, using both visual and written mediums.